| 31. (1) On receipt of an allegation in writing under section 30, the director shall determine whether the allegation shall be heard by | ||
|
(a)
|
where inmates are confined in units, the officer in charge of the unit where the breach is alleged to have taken place, | |
|
(b)
|
a person, other than an officer, appointed by the commissioner, or | |
|
(c)
|
a disciplinary panel. | |
| (2) An officer who filed the allegation in writing, witnessed the alleged breach or investigated the allegation shall not be the officer or a member of the disciplinary panel hearing the allegation. | ||
| (3) A disciplinary panel shall be composed in one of the following ways: | ||
|
(a)
|
the director as chairman and 2 other members, one of whom is an officer appointed by the director, and the other a person, other than an officer, appointed by the commissioner; | |
|
(b)
|
a person, other than an officer, appointed by the commissioner as chairman, and 2 other members, one of whom is the director and the other an officer appointed by the director; | |
|
(c)
|
the director as chairman and 2 other members who are officers appointed by the director. | |
| (4) In a correctional centre or unit other than one described by subsection (3), the disciplinary panel has the following membership: | ||
|
(a)
|
the director, who is chairman; | |
|
(b)
|
two officers selected from time to time by the director. | |
| (5) Repealed. [B.C. Reg. 393/85, s. 15.] | ||