Zubi v. Canada


(1993), 21 Admin. L.R. (2d) 291, 71 F.T.R.168, [1993] F.C.J. No.1061 (F.C.T.D.)

     Z was involuntarily transferred from a minimum-security institution to a medium security institution on the basis of his alleged involvement in the assault of another inmate. Claiming that he was never involved in such an assault and concerned that such a transfer would reflect negatively on his parole application, Z filed a statement of claim whereby he sought declaratory relief against the decision to transfer him to a medium security facility, to declare him to be a minimum security inmate, as well as damages in the amount of $5000. The defendant government sought to strike out the statement of claim on the basis that it disclosed no reasonable cause of action. In striking out the statement of claim, Cullen J. pointed out that it was clear from the statement of claim that the relief sought was of the type contemplated by s18 of the Federal Court Act, and not simply damages against the Crown. Thus, the proper course of action for the plaintiff would be to bring an application for judicial review pursuant to ss18 and 18.1, and then, if successful, bring an action for damages.
TOP